Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish. Smoking ban will definitely improve the quality of air we breathe. To start with, a smoking ban is a manifestation of social injustice in its pure form.
Write at least words. In conclusion, I personally believe that all governments should ban smoking in public places. In fact, statistics have shown tremendous rise in the occurrence of mouth cancer among people who smoke regularly.
Passive smoking also kills. It is dangerous and I think it is more important to save something then to be sorry later for it, and that it is very selfish from the others who smoke to say that they should be allowed to enjoy the smell of the cigarettes, while others suffer.
Unlike Agreeing with the proposed smoking ban essay, smoking tobacco does not make people behave inadequately, and does not pose immediate danger to the health of a smoker or people around them—unlike a drunk person who can act aggressively or insulting towards others. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
But the biggest concern is that millions of forests have burned in the past decade just because smokers leave them lit up. It is strange democratic societies do not compromise in these circumstances UnhealthyNationFS. Public attention to the problem of smoking cigarettes remains significant; in addition, smoking has undergone radical controlling measures, such as bans from numerous healthcare and governmental organizations.
Many people today suffer from asthma and they can not have just a little stroke but die. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. In my opinion, others too should follow suit and ban it. However, despite the seeming rationality standing behind these measures, smoking bans are in fact much less fair than it is usually considered.
Even though smoking has become less popular in the recent decade, there still lives a large amount of smokers of all ages whose rights are infringed upon by such measures.
Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Submit Yes, smoking should be banned. In fact, smokers have to deal with zero tolerance and direct tyranny of the non-smoking majority.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.
In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in public places except in certain areas. In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Even though smoking remains a dangerous and harmful habit, smokers are the same people as non-smokers, and have the same rights.
Also, there are many diseases, such as cancer and cirrhosis that can be easily developed in a living body not just in a smoker one but in the liver that is needed by the one that is smoking. Pollution is one of the biggest problems that we face today.
It is evident that smoking plays a significant role in damaging our health and our environment. Yes, it should be banned because people who smoke say that they have paid enough so why should they be forbidden to smoke, but it is not the non-smoker fault that they had spend so much money on cigarettes, it was their own choice.
In fact, we are talking about segregation based on a lifestyle criteria UnhealthyNationFS. Besides, rather often, establishments today have no separate rooms for smokers and non-smokers, so smokers often have to either accept the rules, or leave.
Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? If people are allowed to smoke in crowded public places like railway stations or bus stands, its harmful effects will have to be borne by all people standing next to the smoker.
In addition to cancer, smoking causes several other health problems. However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. Write about the following topic: In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore.
All countries should make these rules.This essay is well organized and presented. The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument. The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first.
Submit your essay for analysis. Categories. a smoking ban is a manifestation of social injustice in smoking bans are sometimes imposed in an anti. Band 9 essay sample: All governments should ban smoking in Do you agree or disagree with I personally believe that all governments should ban smoking in.
Agreeing with the Proposed Smoking Ban As the proposed ban on smoking in public places, including bars, clubs and restaurants looms ever closer to being passed and put into action. We need to ask ourselves what effect this law would have upon both the nightlife and social aspects of already large and growing towns and cities such as.
SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED? Essay the calls for a total ban on cigarette smoking Governments all over the world have either proposed or are.
Agreeing with the Proposed Smoking Ban Essay example - Agreeing with the Proposed Smoking Ban As the proposed ban on smoking in public places.Download